Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 30, 2013 at 15:58 comment added KRyan @Tridus Super-strictly-speaking, that’s only true if the text says so, because usually the same-source rule would prevent stacking by multiple class features named Sneak Attack. Notably, the Rogue’s does not say it stacks, which is fine as long as all your other sources say they do (and, to my knowledge, the only other cases that don’t automatically stack are the Swordsage’s Assassin’s Stance, which has somewhat weird rules, and the Factotum’s Cunning Strike, which simply doesn’t mention stacking).
Aug 30, 2013 at 15:50 comment added Tridus One extra note for Sneak Attack is that it stacks from other sources. If you take a second class that has Sneak Attack +1d6, you get to add that to what you already have.
Aug 30, 2013 at 14:03 history edited KRyan CC BY-SA 3.0
quoting the errata rule
Aug 30, 2013 at 14:02 comment added KRyan @Catbeller For reference, the “text-trumps-table” rule is established in the introduction of the Player’s Handbook errata.
Aug 30, 2013 at 13:57 comment added Catbeller I know this phrase, and I should have looked more carefully at the text. Awesome response and response time. I was expecting answers in days not minutes. This will add and expand my outlook on rogues a bit. For Example Prestige Class Aerialist gets a sneak attack +1d6 at first level and 1d6 every 2 levels following. But if you look at the table you might be led to believe that your Sneak attack resets, or adds to your previous. And this was the thought process that pushed the discussion of stacking Sneak Attacks damage. this is often termed “text-trumps-table.” Will be thrown at someone
Aug 30, 2013 at 13:44 history edited Zachiel CC BY-SA 3.0
a ) was missing
Aug 30, 2013 at 13:39 history answered KRyan CC BY-SA 3.0