Timeline for Using Intimidate and/or Diplomacy to kill enemies
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2013 at 20:25 | comment | added | MirroredFate | The less the NPC would want to take the action, the higher the DC would be on an intimidate or diplomacy check, it seems to me. | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 17:57 | comment | added | Sconibulus | No action seems innocuous when forced by an Intimidate check... | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 16:59 | comment | added | KRyan | @wraith808 Probably worth noting, however, that the rules pretty much do say “have to” (barring acts “against the target’s nature,” which probably doesn’t cover enough), though that’s almost-universally agreed to be a bad rule. | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 16:25 | comment | added | Chuck Dee | +1 for have to vs. probably do it. Especially if in diplomacy situations, there is a probable gain by doing so. | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 15:07 | history | answered | TimothyAWiseman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |