Timeline for Using Intimidate and/or Diplomacy to kill enemies
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2013 at 18:47 | comment | added | E L | @MirroredFate "You're reasoning is flawless and I totally agree with you. I should eat less junk food and exercise more. Now pass the Cheetos." | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 23:28 | comment | added | MirroredFate | @NeilSlater I think that's fair. Personally, my call as a DM would be to allow players to possibly acquire allies through the Diplomacy skill, although that ability is not explicitly stated. It just makes sense within the context of what diplomacy actually is. However, were they then to attempt to get an NPC to do something potentially harmful, and the NPC was to question it, it would be all about bluff. If they lied, anyway. If they tried to explain why it would be best if the NPC took the hit for the group, it would be Diplomacy against a high DC. | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 23:16 | comment | added | Neil Slater | @MirroredFate: I would say that has to be backed up with a player rationale why it isn't a weird request in context of the story. Bluff is the go-to skill for clever ruses, but Diplomacy might get you into a situation/position to try them. | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 20:31 | comment | added | MirroredFate | What if your argument is that they would be better suited standing in a different part of the room? | |
| S Oct 31, 2013 at 18:19 | history | suggested | Neil Slater | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling of Intimidate
|
| Oct 31, 2013 at 17:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 31, 2013 at 18:19 | |||||
| Oct 31, 2013 at 17:35 | history | edited | SevenSidedDie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
quote formatting
|
| Oct 31, 2013 at 17:26 | history | answered | E L | CC BY-SA 3.0 |