Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

#Yes, you can

Yes, you can

You are wielding a weapon that threatens adjacent squares, and using both hands on your polearm does not interfere with the use of the armor spikes. Thus, you can make attacks with them and threaten the squares they reach.

Note that there is usually a hefty gold cost to doing this, as you have to pay for two weapons instead of one. Typically a reach-weapon-user’s armor spikes lag quite a bit behind his main polearm in terms of special abilities.

#Yes, you can

You are wielding a weapon that threatens adjacent squares, and using both hands on your polearm does not interfere with the use of the armor spikes. Thus, you can make attacks with them and threaten the squares they reach.

Note that there is usually a hefty gold cost to doing this, as you have to pay for two weapons instead of one. Typically a reach-weapon-user’s armor spikes lag quite a bit behind his main polearm in terms of special abilities.

Yes, you can

You are wielding a weapon that threatens adjacent squares, and using both hands on your polearm does not interfere with the use of the armor spikes. Thus, you can make attacks with them and threaten the squares they reach.

Note that there is usually a hefty gold cost to doing this, as you have to pay for two weapons instead of one. Typically a reach-weapon-user’s armor spikes lag quite a bit behind his main polearm in terms of special abilities.

Source Link
KRyan
  • 360.6k
  • 59
  • 942
  • 1.5k

#Yes, you can

You are wielding a weapon that threatens adjacent squares, and using both hands on your polearm does not interfere with the use of the armor spikes. Thus, you can make attacks with them and threaten the squares they reach.

Note that there is usually a hefty gold cost to doing this, as you have to pay for two weapons instead of one. Typically a reach-weapon-user’s armor spikes lag quite a bit behind his main polearm in terms of special abilities.