Timeline for How can I thwart a vampire in the party planning on dominating all of us?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 12, 2014 at 23:19 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Dec 13, 2014 at 0:25 | |||||
Oct 13, 2014 at 1:30 | comment | added | Greenstone Walker | Agreed - in my opinion this is a problem that requires meta-gaming. My approach would be to simply say to the GM and players "I'm not happy with this. It is not fun for me to lose my character." | |
Aug 7, 2014 at 8:38 | comment | added | Falco | Start to gather things against vampires, if you were in two towns in a row with vampires then either there are a lot of vampires in this region, or they're following you, or one of your friends is possibly controlled by a vampire (maybe without even knowing!!!) So after nightly encounters you should do all the checks just to be on the safe side: Wear garlic, sleep in houses without invitation and train with the group how to kill vampires! And you can search each other for marks of domination or vampiric infection! | |
Jul 31, 2014 at 0:52 | vote | accept | Kayrock973 | ||
Jul 30, 2014 at 23:24 | vote | accept | Kayrock973 | ||
Jul 31, 2014 at 0:52 | |||||
Jul 30, 2014 at 10:01 | comment | added | Brian Ballsun-Stanton | Comments are not for discussion, folks. Feel free to answer the question yourself. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 7:17 | comment | added | Rob | Also sunlight; seeing the characters reaction to sunlight or avoidance of it is a bit of a giveaway... | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 5:06 | history | edited | Arkhaic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 371 characters in body
|
Jul 30, 2014 at 1:19 | history | edited | doppelgreener | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 112 characters in body
|
Jul 30, 2014 at 1:14 | history | edited | Arkhaic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 101 characters in body
|
Jul 30, 2014 at 1:07 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | I'm extremely dubious that you can use dominate person on yourself as, though the mechanics are superficially applicable, the actual spell effects are nonsensical when both caster and subject are the same person. But the rest of the answer is good enough that I'm going to give it the +1 anyway. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 0:55 | comment | added | Hey I Can Chan | I hadn't ever considered someone casting the spell dominate person on oneself to resist mental control. That's really neat. | |
Jul 30, 2014 at 0:49 | history | edited | BESW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed incidental profanity
|
Jul 30, 2014 at 0:36 | history | edited | Arkhaic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Bolderized stuff
|
Jul 30, 2014 at 0:28 | history | answered | Arkhaic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |