Timeline for Does an Enlarge/Reduce spell on a druid affect the beast form if the druid Wild-Shapes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2020 at 7:56 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added link to SevenSidedDie's answer
|
| Jul 14, 2015 at 0:20 | comment | added | xanderh | I have to agree with @Dokebibul here. The word feature is almost always used in reference to class features, especially so with Player Characters. The enlarge/reduce spell has an effect, not a feature. | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 15:39 | comment | added | Mr. Sandman | About 5.1, I would say that being enlarged/reduced is not a feature, it's an effect. Although there is no definition of the word 'feature' in the books (that I can remember), it is used for capabilities obtained from classes, races or backgrounds. On the other hand, when talking about spells the books always tell about the spell's "effect", not feature. | |
| Jun 4, 2015 at 12:47 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | Question 1 is a red herring, as the proportions are to scale per spell description. Question 2 is also answered by the proportions question. You can answer those in text with yes and be consistent with the spell description. Your ruling makes sense, and I'll point my DM to this page. | |
| Jun 4, 2015 at 12:35 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | "You retain the benefit of any features from your class, race, or other source and can use them if the new form is physically capable of doing so." Is not the spell an "other source," whose benefit in Strength checks and damage carries over? It does not seem that you included that element of the text into your analysis in 5.2. | |
| Jun 4, 2015 at 3:40 | history | edited | Dale M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 61 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2015 at 1:42 | history | answered | Dale M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |