Timeline for Which spells can a multiclass bard cast with an instrument focus?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 6, 2016 at 17:56 | comment | added | Tab Atkins-Bittner | And more specifically, the component pouch is "in place of the components specified for a spell". Components with GP cost still need to be manually supplied. You only need to worry about consumption of non-costed components if you're carrying the components manually, rather using a component pouch. | |
Feb 1, 2016 at 20:50 | comment | added | Marq | @Escoce Yes, but those components all have a GP cost and can't be provided by a component pouch (or substituted with a spell focus). | |
Feb 1, 2016 at 20:39 | comment | added | Escoce | @MarkCogan PHB PG 203 "if a spell states that a material component is consumed by the spell, the caster must provide there component for each casting of the spell." Therefore many components do not need to be replenished, but some do. | |
Feb 1, 2016 at 20:29 | comment | added | Marq | @Escoce 5e doesn't include "reagents" and there's no rule requiring component pouches to be replenished. | |
Feb 1, 2016 at 20:17 | comment | added | Escoce | True but then you'd have to manage your reagents then wouldn't you? Unless of course the DM calls the components pouch the equivalent of a focus and doesn't require it to be replenished. | |
Feb 1, 2016 at 18:56 | comment | added | Marq | Good point! Done. | |
Feb 1, 2016 at 18:55 | history | edited | Marq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added component pouch info.
|
Feb 1, 2016 at 18:50 | comment | added | Derek Stucki | You may want to add that a component pouch can be used by any caster, thus avoiding the issue altogether. | |
Feb 1, 2016 at 16:35 | vote | accept | Trance Kat | ||
Feb 1, 2016 at 16:34 | vote | accept | Trance Kat | ||
Feb 1, 2016 at 16:34 | |||||
Feb 1, 2016 at 16:15 | history | answered | Marq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |