Timeline for Would changing Surprise to just give Disadvantage on Initiative checks overlap with any existing sources of Disadvantage?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2016 at 1:35 | vote | accept | Robert | ||
| Mar 4, 2016 at 4:48 | history | edited | Dale M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 4, 2016 at 4:34 | comment | added | Robert | I actually wasn't aware that Initiative counted as an ability check. That definitely changes my perspective! | |
| Mar 1, 2016 at 0:44 | history | edited | Dale M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 63 characters in body
|
| Feb 29, 2016 at 15:14 | comment | added | Airatome | Yes, Assassinate would take a huge blow as a result of this. | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 12:12 | comment | added | xanderh | You may also want to mention the "assassin" roguish archetype, which converts all hits on a surprised creature into crits. This houserule would massively disadvantage this archetype | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 4:13 | history | edited | Dale M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 179 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2016 at 23:39 | history | answered | Dale M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |