Timeline for Do Nondetection and Invisibility protect you from True Seeing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 10, 2022 at 19:59 | comment | added | squireson | The "Target" of a true seeing spell is the creature that the caster grants true seeing to. Similarly the target of non detection is the creature/object/effect that the caster wants to go undetected. NOTE: nondetection doesn't work against true sight that is inherent to a creature. This is not considered 'divination magic'. Dragons still see the target. | |
Mar 18, 2022 at 13:22 | comment | added | Danger Lake | If I am fighting a monster immune to attacks from non-magical weapons that cannot be targeted by spells, I cast magic weapon on my sword and then hit the monster, do I deal damage to it? Is the monster now the target of my magic weapon spell? I don't think so, as I can't target the monster with "Magic weapon" nor can I target an (in)visible object with "see invisibility". I do understand the confusion and "Target" does need tighter usage and clarification in general, and spell descriptions could explain that targets become Immune to Divination magic or effects. It's fairly ambiguous as it is. | |
Jan 13, 2017 at 9:02 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=27327 by developer User.Id=1645 | |
Jun 11, 2016 at 12:03 | history | edited | A. Foster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add section on RAW from the Targets rules in the PHB
|
Jun 11, 2016 at 7:30 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=27327 by developer User.Id=1645 | |
Jan 13, 2017 at 9:02 | |||||
Jun 1, 2016 at 15:52 | history | edited | A. Foster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added paragraph about spells with explicit "target" in description. Minor changes to wording and punctuation to clarify meaning
|
Jun 1, 2016 at 0:52 | history | answered | A. Foster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |