Timeline for Does globe of invulnerability exclude summoned monsters from the area?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 17:00 | comment | added | Simanos | Also it's easier to adjudicate some times. Let's say a caster in one room casts a spell and a caster in another room casts Globe at some point in "RP" time. Then person A goes into person B's room and the DM doesn't have a handle down to the millisecond on who cast which spell first. | |
| Dec 18, 2016 at 15:05 | comment | added | Simanos | When the RAW text is ambiguous (and it almost always is, to varying degrees) there's always some interpretation of the words/phrases going on at a high or low level. I don't think the posters at EN World have crossed over into a conspiracy theory level of interpretation in this issue. They make some pretty logical arguments for either case. Maybe I should sit down and write down the main thrust of each view instead of linking their words. | |
| Dec 18, 2016 at 2:49 | comment | added | mxyzplk | Are other peoples' opinions less opiniony? What is any real source for saying "they must have only meant a subset of spells?" | |
| Dec 18, 2016 at 0:41 | history | edited | SevenSidedDie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatted quotes using quote formatting
|
| Dec 17, 2016 at 23:42 | history | edited | Simanos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 825 characters in body
|
| Dec 17, 2016 at 23:37 | history | answered | Simanos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |