Timeline for Can an aspect contain too much information and therefore be "too good"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 31, 2017 at 13:01 | comment | added | shawnhcorey | Aspects are not Skills. Just because he is known as a pirate king does not make him a good pirate. Skills are what make him a good pirate. This aspect is about reputation. He may be able to intimidate some people with it. Or he may have to hide from authorities. That's what makes it an aspect. | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 9:32 | comment | added | Yianes the Sneak | I'd like to add that this aspect doesn't say that at all. An aspect says only what is written, no more, no less. In that case this aspect says he IS the legendary Pirate King Stevens. He's still king, wasn't deposed and wasn't a gladiator either. | |
Jan 6, 2017 at 21:39 | vote | accept | Neutrino | ||
Jan 5, 2017 at 15:29 | comment | added | Ysharros | An aspect that's "too good" could conceivably be one that can't be compelled, or with great difficulty, and is therefore not as balanced as Fate encourages them to be. It can also, as in this case, be an aspect that is way too broad (and I agree with @beanluc's answer below) and kind of designed with min/maxing in mind. Aspects aren't for min/maxing - nor is Fate, really. | |
Jan 4, 2017 at 14:37 | answer | added | edgerunner | timeline score: 1 | |
S Jan 4, 2017 at 13:44 | history | suggested | Falco |
added [fate] to tags, because this is about fate in general, not only accelerated
|
|
Jan 4, 2017 at 13:10 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 4, 2017 at 13:44 | |||||
Jan 2, 2017 at 18:01 | comment | added | Malice Vidrine | I'm curious what you think might be the problem with an aspect that's "too good" in this sense, and how this would be fixed merely by breaking it into different aspects? If anything, putting too much information into one aspect weakens your ability to invoke aspects. | |
Jan 2, 2017 at 14:17 | answer | added | Falco | timeline score: 5 | |
Jan 2, 2017 at 3:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackRPG/status/815769548767064064 | ||
Jan 2, 2017 at 1:15 | answer | added | Beanluc | timeline score: 19 | |
S Jan 2, 2017 at 0:59 | history | suggested | Beanluc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
http://www.faterpg.com/2013/fate-not-fate/ Fate not FATE
|
Jan 2, 2017 at 0:40 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 2, 2017 at 0:59 | |||||
Jan 2, 2017 at 0:30 | history | edited | John Dallman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling
|
Jan 2, 2017 at 0:08 | answer | added | Xavon_Wrentaile | timeline score: 6 | |
Jan 1, 2017 at 23:24 | history | asked | Neutrino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |