Skip to main content
Role-playing Games

Return to Answer

deleted 24 characters in body
Source Link
doppelgreener
doppelgreener
  • 36.6k
  • 16
  • 162
  • 255

Rulings not Rules

I think you've exhausted the specific rules in your question, so you're going to need your DM to rule on this, or if you're a DM - decide!

  • I would certainly reward player ingenuity and allow this effect for one turn.
  • But it would also be possible to make a case for the Vampire not being "in" running water (in the same way it would be if it were in a river). Also the DM could rule that the water canon knocks it back, and out of the way of the water.

Rulings not Rules

I think you've exhausted the specific rules in your question, so you're going to need your DM to rule on this, or if you're a DM - decide!

  • I would certainly reward player ingenuity and allow this effect for one turn.
  • But it would also be possible to make a case for the Vampire not being "in" running water (in the same way it would be if it were in a river). Also the DM could rule that the water canon knocks it back, and out of the way of the water.

I think you've exhausted the specific rules in your question, so you're going to need your DM to rule on this, or if you're a DM - decide!

  • I would certainly reward player ingenuity and allow this effect for one turn.
  • But it would also be possible to make a case for the Vampire not being "in" running water (in the same way it would be if it were in a river). Also the DM could rule that the water canon knocks it back, and out of the way of the water.
Improved first sentence
Source Link
harlandski
harlandski
  • 15.3k
  • 2
  • 56
  • 92

Rulings not Rules

As D&D 5e doesn't get so detailed withI think you've exhausted the specific damage typesrules in your question, so you're going to need your DM to rule on this, or if you're a DM - decide!

  • I would certainly reward player ingenuity and allow this effect for one turn.
  • But it would also be possible to make a case for the Vampire not being "in" running water (in the same way it would be if it were in a river). Also the DM could rule that the water canon knocks it back, and out of the way of the water.

Rulings not Rules

As D&D 5e doesn't get so detailed with specific damage types, you're going to need your DM to rule on this, or if you're a DM - decide!

  • I would certainly reward player ingenuity and allow this effect for one turn.
  • But it would also be possible to make a case for the Vampire not being "in" running water (in the same way it would be if it were in a river). Also the DM could rule that the water canon knocks it back, and out of the way of the water.

Rulings not Rules

I think you've exhausted the specific rules in your question, so you're going to need your DM to rule on this, or if you're a DM - decide!

  • I would certainly reward player ingenuity and allow this effect for one turn.
  • But it would also be possible to make a case for the Vampire not being "in" running water (in the same way it would be if it were in a river). Also the DM could rule that the water canon knocks it back, and out of the way of the water.
Source Link
harlandski
harlandski
  • 15.3k
  • 2
  • 56
  • 92

Rulings not Rules

As D&D 5e doesn't get so detailed with specific damage types, you're going to need your DM to rule on this, or if you're a DM - decide!

  • I would certainly reward player ingenuity and allow this effect for one turn.
  • But it would also be possible to make a case for the Vampire not being "in" running water (in the same way it would be if it were in a river). Also the DM could rule that the water canon knocks it back, and out of the way of the water.