3
\$\begingroup\$

After a brief discussion in chat about the topic, (which didn't really go anywhere), I was wondering if there was anything in the rules that determined whether certain classes must have particular alignments? (E.g. Paladins must be Lawful-Good to Lawful-Neutral)

Is there a difference in Editions?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What is the reason for the negative score? Helps to know why certain questions are voted down. \$\endgroup\$ – Premier Bromanov Aug 17 '15 at 21:41
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I can't speak for everyone, but I personally downvoted because "this question does not show research effort." \$\endgroup\$ – GMJoe Aug 18 '15 at 0:02
13
\$\begingroup\$

Each edition has different rules with respect to this. D&D 5e removed all restrictions and made alignment a general thing for characters. There is flavour text indicating which classes tend to do what, however the customization aspect allows for things like chaotic-evil Paladins.

For other editions, the easiest way to find out is to look up the class you're interested in and whatever edition you are playing.

For instance: Google search 3.5 Monk to find out that Monks need to be any lawful category.

As an example, D&D 3.5 has alignment rules for several classes such as Paladin, Barbarian and Druid.

Barbarians (any non-lawful); Paladins (lawful good); Druid (any neutral)

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.