Would a deity's divine blessing be affected by antimagic field? Would other types of divine blessings? Would different types of blessings be affected differently by an antimagic field?
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
2
-
\$\begingroup\$ Curiosity: Did this come up in play or are you working toward a trick? \$\endgroup\$– Hey I Can ChanCommented Aug 27, 2017 at 7:40
-
\$\begingroup\$ Trick. I'm trying to find the boundaries between what deity given effects persist in an antimagic field and which don't, specifically for vow of poverty. \$\endgroup\$– CellheimCommented Aug 27, 2017 at 19:59
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
6
No, salient divine abilities are not affected by antimagic fields.
In the general rules about divine abilities at the top of your linked page is the following:
Salient Divine Abilities and Antimagic
A salient divine ability functions normally within an antimagic field, and is never subject to spell resistance.
-
\$\begingroup\$ So could this be extrapolated to divine blessings (not the specific ability) in general? Oh, I'm just going to come out and say it: I want the extraordinary abilities from my deity-given vow of poverty to not be suppressed in an antimagic field, and I'm wondering if the fact that it was given to me by my deity gives me a RAW loophole. \$\endgroup\$– CellheimCommented Aug 27, 2017 at 9:07
-
\$\begingroup\$ @Cellheim You already asked that question; asking it again under a different guise is an excellent way to spoil people’s interest in volunteering their time to help you. And, no matter how many times you ask it, the answer will still be no. \$\endgroup\$– KRyanCommented Aug 27, 2017 at 14:51
-
\$\begingroup\$ @KRyan I know but it looked like you were wrong and the specific ability divine blessing lasts in a antimagic field, so why not divine blessings in general? I just wasn't sure if the previous thread was considered closed or something since it had been so long. That's why I didn't just post a new comment there. Apologies if that would have been the appropriate thing to do. \$\endgroup\$– CellheimCommented Aug 28, 2017 at 4:13
-
\$\begingroup\$ @Cellheim No, questions don’t age out here; we try to keep one question for each, well, question. If you find answers to your questions aren’t quite getting at the details you want, editing is the answer. If you just want more attention on the question, a bounty is the solution. Duplicate questions are bad; this one isn’t quite but it is a rather trivial question on its face and the real question you meant to ask would be. Please see the tour for more about how we work here. \$\endgroup\$– KRyanCommented Aug 28, 2017 at 4:17
-
\$\begingroup\$ @KRyan should I delete it and go back to the first question? \$\endgroup\$– CellheimCommented Aug 28, 2017 at 4:19