A player playing a Paladin in my current D&D campaign has asked how much it would cost to build or rent a building to house his followers from the Leadership feat. It would only be a small premises, enough to house a handful of followers, but it'd need to be able to be upgraded should the need arise.

I applaud the players thinking around this so I'm going to allow it – I just haven't a clue how much this should cost. How much should I charge the player for building a new premises for this purpose and how long should it take to build in-game? Also, if a building were rented, what would be an appropriate weekly charge?


The 3.5 Dungeon Master's Guide contains a small table on building costs. Page 101.

But, for detailed guidelines on how to handle character-made buildings in 3E (including detailed cost and construction time rules), refer to the Stronghold Builder's Guidebook. It is a 3.0 book, but requires minimal updating.

As far as renting goes... you could calculate the building's cost, and decide on a PE Ratio (price-rent ratio in real estate) to get some kind of a guideline on how much you should be charging. D&D economics are not exactly fleshed out, though (and they probably shouldn't be), so you have a lot of freedom here.

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ One of the things to consider beyond the raw cost of building something is the cost of obtaining the land and permission to build. This is one of those areas you can exploit to form an adventure hook "Of course you can build on my land. However, I have this little problem..." or use to increase the cost of building in particular areas. \$\endgroup\$ – Gaxx Apr 15 '13 at 8:43
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This is covered in the Stronghold Builder's Guide, if I recall. I don't think the book is a well-balanced one, but it is remarkably comprehensive. \$\endgroup\$ – Ernir Apr 15 '13 at 10:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ah - it may well be. I've only ever skim-read it and that a long while ago... \$\endgroup\$ – Gaxx Apr 15 '13 at 10:49

The economic systems in D&D3+ strongly emphasize game balance over realism. The reward system is tightly tied to character level, and the pricing system is tied to combat and adventuring value. To avoid equipment and power imbalances, it's a good idea to keep utility items relatively cheap, even though something like a keep might realistically cost much more. To address realism concerns, you can use a grant from the local rulers to offset the cost of the keep. You could even provide a stronghold at no monetary cost to the paladin – perhaps he could swear loyalty to the local lord instead. That way you pay for a primarily role-playing benefit with a role-playing cost.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Suprisingly, I believe that a keep would be much cheaper than DMG suggests, not much pricier, if based upon the rest of the rules of D&D. I once calculated the price of a motte-and-bailey to be roughly 200 gp (calculated based on the estimated number of workhours PP to build one irl, hireling prices, and other factors) \$\endgroup\$ – kravaros Feb 4 '14 at 17:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ Adventuring costs are inflated, because the game is about adventuring. If you're doing non-adventuring stuff, you should probably deflate the prices. \$\endgroup\$ – Narf the Mouse Oct 25 '18 at 4:03

If you want a good OSR interpretation of a D&D economy, you can do no better than Adventurer, Conqueror, King (ACKS).

ACKS offers a solid economy, good rules for building, holding, and extending strongholds, as well as hirelings, etc. .

  • \$\begingroup\$ The question is asking about 3.5 not OSR, and this isn't an answer, it a pointer to an answer that we can pay money to read. \$\endgroup\$ – Quentin Apr 17 '13 at 9:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Quentin - hmmm...you are correct. Bad me! \$\endgroup\$ – gomad Apr 17 '13 at 11:47
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Quentin The domain rules would work as easily in 3.5 as they do in ACKS, and might be worth the price alone. The cost is a good point, yes, but not a fatal one—someone may already have or be interested in ACKS, and this could help them. \$\endgroup\$ – SevenSidedDie Apr 17 '13 at 15:09
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @SevenSidedDie - you are also correct. This hobby of ours isn't free and there is no expectation that it should be. However, I didn't do a good job of providing an answer and I'll try to correct that later when I have access to my ACKS materials. \$\endgroup\$ – gomad Apr 17 '13 at 15:40

In the context of an Open World design the location is key, as well as the material it is thus made out of. I'm currently an Aritificer who was just banished from the thieves guild and as I was exiled went to a tri city mining town in a half a mile wide hole set in these grasslands. Transportation costs for the lumber, the amount of left over earth and stone from mining, and the ability for myself to craft warforged on demand means that resources are covered as well as labor. I live in a town with people advanced in building and mining, so designing costs are as well my commodity. I build a 2 level home (lets say 1000 per level, plus 500 for every two levels above ground for structural support) and furnish it with a well sized furnace, holsters for made items, tools etc. lets say 500 for each inch of space on a grid of designed furnishings, and do this for the same upstairs and lets say a basement as well. so (1000 per level x3 = 3,000 , 4 grids per levelx3 at 500 each grid change = 6,000, labor and material = 0) Overall House cost is roughly 9,000 for a 2 story home with well made furnishings and good foundation, 4 bedrooms and a basement made out of stone and wood.


protected by Oblivious Sage Oct 29 '18 at 3:18

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.