-2
\$\begingroup\$

The Phoenix Sorcerer from Unearthed Arcana: Sorcerer has the feature Mantle of Flame, which allows you to "wreathe yourself in swirling fire" for one minute. One of its effects is described as follows:

Any creature takes fire damage equal to your Charisma modifier if it hits you with a melee attack from within 5 feet of you or if it touches you.

What does "touches you" entail? Do unarmed strikes count as touching?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ I could swear that there's been at least one question before about the difference between unarmed strikes and touch-range spells... \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Commented May 28, 2018 at 2:40

1 Answer 1

14
\$\begingroup\$

Touch means touch.

There is no rules definition for what it means to touch something, so it is meant to be interpreted based on the normal meaning of the word. Note that if there were a spell or other feature which is defined to require touching a creature (like the paladin's Lay on Hands) then that would explicitly be a feature which would trigger the phoenix effect as part of its normal use.

Regarding unarmed strikes, they are already melee attacks, so if they hit then they trigger the effect anyway. It doesn't matter whether they would count as touching or not, because the conclusion is foregone.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ What if you strike them with an unarmed strike? They are touching you still, no? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 28, 2018 at 14:26
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Please read the second paragraph of my answer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 28, 2018 at 14:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ That is if it hits you, not if you hit it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 28, 2018 at 21:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's pretty clear in context that the other creature is the one doing the touching. Otherwise, the rule would not say if they hit you or they touch you-- it would say if either of you hits each other or touches each other. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 29, 2018 at 1:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ To me it just seems impossible for me to be touching them without also having them being touching me \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 29, 2018 at 6:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .