6
\$\begingroup\$

Scenario:

A druid ally is in melee range of an enemy berserker and decides to move away, provoking an attack of opportunity from the berserker.

My character has readied an action: Cast Eldritch Blast (with Repelling Blast invocation) on the berserker in question if he attacks the druid.

What I think happens

The druid's movement is interrupted by the attack of opportunity which is in turn interrupted by the readied Eldritch Blast. Assuming the Eldritch Blast hits, I can push the berserker out of melee range of the druid, thereby negating the attack of opportunity.

Is this correct?

Similar situations

What if, rather, the trigger was the druid moving? What if the trigger was the berserker raising his weapon or rearing back in preparation for an attack?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I am assuming this scenario is the warlock wants to protect the druid. So the trigger is "On a signal from the druid" which the druid does before he wants to move. \$\endgroup\$
    – SeriousBri
    Commented Sep 27, 2018 at 7:20

2 Answers 2

15
\$\begingroup\$

Your Druid Gets Attacked, then the barbarian gets pushed

The trigger for your readied action was:

Cast Eldritch Blast (with Repelling Blast invocation) on the berserker in question if he attacks the druid.

It is stated in the Dungeon Master's Guide (p. 252) that:

If a reaction has no timing specified, or the timing is unclear, the reaction occurs after its trigger finishes, as in the Ready action.

So your readied Eldritch Blast will occur right after the berserker attacks the druid.


What if, rather, the trigger was the druid moving? What if the trigger was the berserker raising his weapon or rearing back in preparation for an attack?

The alternative triggers would not improve matters much. If you specified the trigger was "the berserker raises his weapon to attack", that might be tricky, because the trigger has to be a "percievable circumstance." In combat, everyone always looks like they're just about to attack each other: what if the enemy doesn't "raise" a weapon, but stabs with it? What if they raise a weapon in salute?

If the tirgger was the Druid's movement, that's no good either because the Barbarian will attack before the Druid moves away from his reach (as that's the timing specified in Opportunity Attacks), and you'd Eldritch Blast after the Druid finished moving away from his reach (since it's a Readied action, and happens after its trigger), so the berserker would still attack first.

A relevant question that has been asked before is can I specify a trigger to be "before... occurs"? (Mostly, you can't).

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ I knew the wording of the trigger was critical.What if I instead said the trigger was the Druid's movement or the berserker raising his weapon in preparation to make an attack? \$\endgroup\$
    – Rykara
    Commented Sep 27, 2018 at 0:47
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ That might be tricky, because the trigger has to be a "percievable circumstance." In combat, everyone always looks like they're just about to attack each other: what if the enemy doesn't "raise" a weapon, but stabs with it? What if they raise a weapon in salute? A relevant question that has been asked before is Can I specify a trigger to be "before... occurs"? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 27, 2018 at 1:12
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ As far as the Druid's movement, that's no good either because the Barbarian will attack before the Druid moves away from his reach (as that's the timing specified in Opportunity Attacks), and you'd Eldritch Blast after the Druid finished moving away from his reach (since it's a Readied action, and happens after its trigger), so the berserker would still attack first. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 27, 2018 at 1:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ It might be better to quote the specific rules on the Ready action rather than the general rules on reactions, since the specific rules more clearly state that readied actions must take place after their trigger. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 27, 2018 at 15:28
-1
\$\begingroup\$

You cannot prevent the barbarian from finishing its attack on the Druid

As per Ready action rules (emphasis mine)

When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger. Remember that you can take only one reaction per round.

No matter how you state the trigger, the action trigger will always complete before the ready action is performed. Also note that the trigger must be a perceivable in-game action (a movement, any of the actions in the PHB or something similar)

So in your example you could have stated as a trigger

  1. When the barbarian attacks the druid
  2. when the druid moves
  3. When the druid leaves the reach of the barbarian

None of the resulting ready action would allow you to cast the spell before the barbarian finishes the attack on the druid. I actually don't have anything coming to mind that you could have used as a trigger to prevent it.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Forgive me if I’m missing something, does this answer address anything the accepted answer did not? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 1:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ After reeading the coments some people comp.,ained a little bit about the missing references and the answer that were unclear.. i cannot edit the other post so i just added what the comments mentioned for clarity's sake. it is nmot a different answer. (i acutally upvoted the other one lol because it is the right answer) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 3:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .