5
\$\begingroup\$

Relevant parts of Unseen Servant spell:

This spell creates an invisible, mindless, shapeless, Medium force that performs simple tasks at your command until the spell ends. The servant springs into existence in an unoccupied space on the ground within range.

...

you can mentally command the servant to move up to 15 feet and interact with an object. The servant can perform simple tasks that a human servant could do, such as fetching things, cleaning, mending, folding clothes, lighting fires, serving food, and pouring wine. Once you give the command, the servant performs the task to the best of its ability until it completes the task, then waits for your next command.

It seems to have size comparable to a Medium creature, and it has position. It seems to me that RAW, it can not take hide action (or any action in the rules sense), so it would never be hidden. There is no DC for detecting it given, which supports this interpretation. However, this RAW interpretation does not really make sense, because it is invisible and does not in itself make any noise, so it sounds like it is undetectable unless it interacts with an object, even if it is not hidden.

So, how to rule on detection of existence and location of an Unseen Servant?

Let's narrow this down by saying that no Detect Magic, Truesight or other such spells or abilities are in use. Also let's leave blindsight out of the scope.

There are several cases, starting from it simply idling and waiting for command: is it possible to know it is there and has not moved, and how to describe this situation to the players? Is it possible to even detect it moving in unobstructed space, if it's not carrying something? What about when it performs a task such as pouring wine, is it possible to distinguish an Unseen Servant from an invisible Mage Hand when all you actually see is just a bottle moving by itself?

It seems this is one of the many things the DM just needs to make their own ruling on, but what do the rules say about this, did I miss something?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ @WakiNadiVellir That is clearer. 😊 \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 8, 2021 at 23:56

3 Answers 3

5
\$\begingroup\$

You can't know it is there

Unseen Servant creates (emphases mine):

an invisible, mindless, shapeless, Medium force that performs simple tasks at your command until the spell ends. The servant springs into existence in an unoccupied space on the ground within range.

As stated, the servant is invisible (meaning it cannot be seen) and is a force (meaning it cannot be touched). Although not explicitly stated, it is reasonable to assume that it also does not by itself produce taste, sound, or smell.

Typically detecting the presence of something (some thing) would be done with Perception (emphases mine):

Your Wisdom (Perception) check lets you spot, hear, or otherwise detect the presence of something. It measures your general awareness of your surroundings and the keenness of your senses. For example, you might try to hear a conversation through a closed door, eavesdrop under an open window, or hear monsters moving stealthily in the forest. Or you might try to spot things that are obscured or easy to miss, whether they are orcs lying in ambush on a road, thugs hiding in the shadows of an alley, or candlelight under a closed secret door.

Note the emphasis on using one's senses to detect the presence of things. Nothing in here implies that one might use Perception to detect the presence of a non-physical force.

[One might object that if the force truly has no physical presence, why then does it have a size, specified as Medium? I believe the intent here is both to clarify the part of the spell that says it must appear in an unoccupied space (that space being the size of a Medium creature, 5' square), and also setting a range for the size of objects it can manipulate - it would be able to hold up no more than a 5' section of rope, for example.]

Since it is a magical force, one might think it detectable by an Arcana check, but lo:

Your Intelligence (Arcana) check measures your ability to recall lore about spells, magic items, eldritch symbols, magical traditions, the planes of existence, and the inhabitants of those planes.

RAW, your Arcana functions for memory recall only, not as a limited 'detect magic' ability or some way to perceive mystic forces.

By their fruits ye shall know them

If there is no way to know that an unoccupied unseen servant is present, it is possible to deduce the presence of one through watching it work. That is the role of an Investigation check (emphasis mine):

When you look around for clues and make deductions based on those clues, you make an Intelligence (Investigation) check. You might deduce the location of a hidden object, discern from the appearance of a wound what kind of weapon dealt it, or determine the weakest point in a tunnel that could cause it to collapse.

When you see a bottle of wine being poured with no obvious support, you begin to make hypotheses - is it caused by an invisible being? Is it a mystical force? Is the whole thing an illusion? Watching the servant at its duties, seeing how it interacts with the world, will give you evidence to conclude what its nature is by means of a successful Investigation check, just as looking at a wound can tell you about the weapon that made it, even without seeing the weapon itself.

Differentiating from Mage Hand

Suppose you witness some invisible force pouring the contents of a wine bottle. Can you determine whether it is being caused by Unseen Servant or Mage Hand?

Can you see a hand? Mage hand specifically says that the hand is "spectral" - so, ghostly and transparent but visible. To be fair, the OP specified an invisible mage hand, so perhaps one cast by an Arcane Trickster?

Is there a caster nearby? How close? Mage hand vanishes if it is more than 30' from its caster, unseen servant ends if it is more than 60' from the caster. They are going to be close, but the mage hand caster will need to be closer.

What is the wine container like? While the unseen servant can do things that require its force to be spread over a large area or have separate points of application (fold clothes, serve food), any application I have experienced of mage hand limits it to things that an actual, single hand could do, and the list of examples does not contradict this. I can remove the glass stopper of a wine decanter one handed and still pour it, but there is no way I could uncork a fresh bottle of wine with one hand. If your DM feels similarly, that would be an easy tell.

In the absence of these obvious signs, simply saying 'I look for any subtle evidence of the difference between the spells' should be enough to get you some kind of Investigation roll.

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ And yet it has hit points, so you can hit it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Jack
    Commented Dec 9, 2021 at 11:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Jack Indeed, though that likely comes up more often when it is caught in an area of effect. Since it is unseen and unheard, to target it you would first have to guess its location (pretty hard unless it is doing something), and if successful attack at disadvantage because you can't see it. You might think it would be a flat roll because it can't see you, but there is an interesting asymmetry there. You are at disadvantage to attack a target you can't see, but at advantage to attack a creature who can't see you. Since the servant is not a creature, it doesn't matter that it can't see you. \$\endgroup\$
    – Kirt
    Commented Dec 9, 2021 at 15:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ Just because it's an invisible shapeless force doesn't mean it's undetectable. It'd probably noise when it moves, for instance, and it's possible that it'd cause a noticeable heat haze visual warping of the area it's located in, similar to the Predator aliens from the Predator series. \$\endgroup\$
    – nick012000
    Commented Dec 11, 2021 at 16:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ @nick012000 Sure, it could make noise and it could give off heat - but nothing in its description says that it does, and we have the general principle that 'Spells do (only) what they say they do'. Do shapeless forces in general make noise or give off heat? Consider, for example, gravity or magnetism - are these giving off heat or noise in a way that a PC could detect? If a DM wants to rule that the servant is detectable, it's not wrong, but neither is it indicated. \$\endgroup\$
    – Kirt
    Commented Dec 11, 2021 at 19:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Kirt We also have the principle that Invisible things aren't Hidden unless they take the Hide action. \$\endgroup\$
    – nick012000
    Commented Dec 11, 2021 at 23:25
6
\$\begingroup\$

It is merely an invisible thing

As noted, invisible does not mean hidden. An Unseen Servant acts just like a humanoid servant would that you cast Invisibility on.

This makes sense under the (rather nonsensical) rules governing invisibility and the hidden condition. Being invisible confers certain benefits but being hidden isn't one of them.

Nothing here makes it occupy its space, either. Only creatures occupy their space.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ If it's a thing, and not a creature, are the hiding rules (and the hidden condition) relevant? \$\endgroup\$
    – RHS
    Commented Dec 9, 2021 at 15:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ @RHS maybe not, not sure if "hidden condition" only applies to creatures, lol. \$\endgroup\$
    – Tiger Guy
    Commented Dec 9, 2021 at 17:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ Actually, now that I looked it up again, Invisible condition says this: "The creature's location can be detected by any noise it makes or any tracks it leaves." So it doesn't have to be hidden in order to be undetectable. Of course this is a bit of a moot point in most cases, because there is usually not much a creature can do without making sound or leaving tracks. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 9, 2021 at 19:46
-1
\$\begingroup\$

I think you need to make your own ruling.
However,
You can try to use in-game character's knowledge, in particular calss-knowledge. This may not work with your table because it very much depends on players and specific game, but it's interesting use of classes.
Into the example then
Mage hand and prestidigation requires somatic component(https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/mage-hand and https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/prestidigitation) if your players have a mage in a party you can safely assume that this mage know these requirements. So you can rule a perception(or investigation) check to determine if someone made a gesture. If mage player pass this check and no gesture occured you can tell him that it wasn't neither a mage hand nor a prestidigation(or none somatic spell). Then using arcana check you can tell this player that someone or something invisible MIGHT caused that(something of unseen servant "abilities")
This is only a example, you can modify it.
But feel free to classes' knowledge to this type of problems.
In my example I used mage calsses(wizard, warlock, sorcerer) because it's very ulikely that other class has this type of knowledge of spells.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .