Sculpt Spells, a class feature for Evocation Wizards, says the following:

Sculpt Spells

Beginning at 2nd level, you can create pockets of relative safety within the effects of your evocation spells. When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level. The chosen creatures automatically succeed on their saving throws against the spell, and they take no damage if they would normally take half damage on a successful save. (SRD, p. 54)

So, you protect your chosen allies from your evocation spells, by letting them:

  1. Automatically succeed on saving throws.
  2. Take no damage, if they would normally take half damage on a successful save.

This protection feels fairly comprehensive, to the extent that in games I think we've accidentally created a houserule, lapsing into treating this rule in practice as if it actually said:

When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level. The chosen creatures are entirely unaffected by the spell.

This seems, in principle like a massive oversimplification, but I've struggled in practice to articulate what problems it might cause or think of any situations in which the literal RAW and our accidental interpretation of it would not produce exactly the same result.

So, what affect would allowing this houserule to persist have on my game? Does using the correct wording add any significance that I have missed?

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Some of the best moments are created when your team players are forced to move (or succeed a saving throw), possibly get attacked by an opportunity attack so you can throw down your spell. The answers provide sufficient information, but gameplay wise I'd throw your rule out. I personally believe it makes things safer and boring :( \$\endgroup\$
    – Yates
    Aug 7, 2018 at 9:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ThomasYates I feel like, with a little embellishment, that comment is good enough to be stand alone answer - it'd get an upvote from me at any rate. The effect of this houserule on gameplay experience is no worse a thing to consider than the mechanical effect. \$\endgroup\$
    – Tiggerous
    Aug 7, 2018 at 13:04

4 Answers 4


This houserule makes several spells better

It's difficult to make an entire, comprehensive list of all the evocation spells that might be wrongly affected, but basically every spell that does not allow a save, or has downsides regardless of a save would be improved by your houserule.


You can make a forcecage large enough to fit several of your allies in, but the spell does not actually allow any saves. Therefore, anybody stuck in your forcecage is stuck there, Sculpt Spells or not.

Wall of [X]

There are a bunch of spells such as wall of stone, wall of wind, etc. that have negative effects that do not in any way allow saves. Sculpt Spells does nothing for these.

Warding wind

Everybody in the effect is deaf; no saves allowed. Every ranged attacker has disadvantage; everybody suffers from difficult terrain.

Dawn / sunburst / Other spells that make sunlight

They might automatically save to not take damage, but they're still standing in sunlight. Your drow/kobold/duergar/vampire ally is going to have a bad day.

Gust of wind

No saves allowed; several friends might suffer disadvantages.

Earth tremor

No saves allowed; difficult terrain for your allies as well.


No amount of automatic save success is going to allow you to see in magical darkness.

All of the spells above can currently have potential negative effects on characters in the area of effect, including allies. Your houserule would totally eliminate these downsides, making those spells significantly better.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ There's definitely room for interpretation, but my interpretation of earth tremor is that the only part that affects creatures does involve a saving throw, while the other part affects terrain. Basically, I would rule that the ground becomes difficult terrain for everybody even if they weren't affected by the spell. The other examples are good though (especially the wall-related ones). \$\endgroup\$ Aug 6, 2018 at 15:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ I immediately thought of spells like Sleep or Color Spray that affect an area but don't have a save as such. \$\endgroup\$ Aug 6, 2018 at 18:12
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @DarthPseudonym Those aren't evocation spells, so wouldn't be affected by sculpt spells regardless of this houserule. And that's a good point Kamil, but the way the houserule is written, you'd be able to ignore the difficult terrain as well, as it is without a doubt an effect of the spell, and you are "entirely unaffected by the spell", which I'd argue also includes any changes to the terrain it has made to make it difficult terrain. \$\endgroup\$
    – Theik
    Aug 7, 2018 at 6:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think there's a difference between being affected by a spell and being affected by the effects of a spell. I feel like your interpretation gives players far too much immunity. The spell burning hands says that it lights objects on fire. A character is standing next to a barrel of gunpowder that explodes, sets the building on fire, and burns down the building they are standing in. Well, all that was an effect of the spell so they take zero damage? \$\endgroup\$
    – Shane
    Apr 22, 2020 at 4:21

There are several changes

First of all, consider the non-damaging evocation spells, like darkness, which nonetheless are debilitating. If your allies were completely unaffected by your darkness spell, that'd be very different from what Sculpt Spell does to it normally (i.e. nothing).

Second of all, consider evocations that have side effects unrelated to their save, like gust of wind. An ally would automatically succeed at gust of wind's strength save, but would still have to spend double movement to approach you.

Thirdly, consider that some spells just don't allow a save. Spells with attack rolls are unlikely to be cast targeting your allies, but you also need to watch out for spells like Wall of Fire which has secondary damaging effects sculpt spell can't avoid.



For starters. I know that this is not what you meant by your wording, but your rule of

When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level. The chosen creatures are entirely unaffected by the spell.

would imply that the selected creatures are not affected by the spell at all, i.e. could see through the darkness.

Earth tremor

Similar (perhaps weaker) point. Affected area can become difficult terrain, which is supposed to affect all creatures no matter the saving throw.

The list goes on

Force Cage, Ice Storm, Otiluke's Freezing Sphere, The Wall of Stone, Warding Wind

  • \$\begingroup\$ You could more broadly say "any spell that has effects besides causing half damage on a successful save". This includes any spell that has effects not tied to a saving throw. (Seems like @the dark wanderer's new answer basically says exactly that.) \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Aug 6, 2018 at 8:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ @V2Blast True, but to me half the point was to see if there actually are any, plus for example the darkness does not even have a saving throw to begin with. \$\endgroup\$
    – J.E
    Aug 6, 2018 at 8:08

Many spells involving the elements have secondary effects that are not tied to a save; for example.

Storm Sphere:

The sphere’s space is difficult terrain...Creatures within 30 feet of the sphere have disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks made to listen.

By RAW, both of these aspects should still affect the allies protected from damage by sculpt spell.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .