1
\$\begingroup\$

The Ranger subclass in D&D 5e, Hunter, has an 11th-level feature called Multiattack which allows them to pick Volley or Whirlwind.

Volley.
You can use your action to make a ranged attack against any number of creatures within 10 feet of a point you can see within your weapon’s range. You must have ammunition for each target, as normal, and you make a separate attack roll for each target.

Is there anything that would allow a Hunter to use any melee weapons, such as a glaive, to perform a "volley" of stabs by targeting a point within their weapon's reach (such as in front of them) and targeting the creatures within 10 feet of that point to perform a "range attack" despite using a melee weapon?

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hello there! Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour and visit the help center in case you need any guidance for posting questions and answers on this site! Happy gaming! \$\endgroup\$
    – Eddymage
    Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 8:09
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ To give some feedback here, two answers have pointed out that the feature description says “ranged attack” and talks about “ammunition”, which, of course, a glaive is not. Which makes me wonder if we are missing something here. Was there some reason you had in mind for why it might work to use a melee attack when the description says ranged attack? (I think the downvotes here are because it seems like a pretty obvious question.) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 8:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think the question isn't asking if the feature let's you use a melee weapon, the answer to that is obvious. Rather it is asking if some other feature might transform this to allow use of a melee weapon. Example might be something that says 'melee weapon attacks can count as ranged weapon attacks for you'. This is quite common in computer games. \$\endgroup\$
    – SeriousBri
    Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 13:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ @SeriousBri Maybe you're right, but as it is written the question seems to have an obvious answer again.. \$\endgroup\$
    – Eddymage
    Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 13:34
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I reclarified what I meant by ahead of the Hunter. \$\endgroup\$
    – James
    Commented Nov 1, 2022 at 4:21

2 Answers 2

13
\$\begingroup\$

No.

The quoted rules say (emphases mine):

Volley.
You can use your action to make a ranged attack against any number of creatures within 10 feet of a point you can see within your weapon’s range.

The feature requires explicitly a ranged attack, moreover it mentions the weapon's range, not the attack's reach.

The Whirlwind attack option does not allow it either: one cannot attack enemies at more than 5 feet.

The text of Whirlwind Attack says (emphasis mine):

You can use your action to make a melee attack against any number of creatures within 5 feet of you, with a separate attack roll for each target.

Hence, even the glaive's reach is 10 feet, a Ranger with Whirlwind Attack can attack enemies only within 5 feet of them.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

You can only use the volley with ranged weapons that use ammunition

The volley has two conditions for its use

  1. it must be a ranged attack
  2. it must use ammuntion

You can use your action to make a ranged attack against any number of creatures within 10 feet of a point you can see within your weapon’s range. You must have ammunition for each target, as normal, and you make a separate attack roll for each target.

A pure melee weapon, such as a glaive, can not be used for the volley, as it violates both conditions.

While some melee weapons, such as a dagger, light hammer, or handaxe have the thrown property, which allows you to use them for ranged attacks, they do not have the ammuntion property, so even those weapons cannot be used for a volley. Page 146, PHB:

Ammunition. You can use a weapon that has the ammunition property to make a ranged attack only if you have ammunition to fire from the weapon. Each time you attack with the weapon, you expend one piece of ammunition. Drawing the ammunition from a quiver, case, or other container is part of the attack.

While this is the technical rules-as-written answer for thrown weapons, check with your DM. They may be up for allowing you to throw multiple daggers or such, in case you have them in a belt to throw. This should not be unbalancing, as a bow tends to deal as much or more damage than these weapons, and either one will suffer disadavantage if used in close combat, so it is more of a flavor question to allow this or not.

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ But if you have 5 daggers, can you target 5 enemies? \$\endgroup\$
    – Eddymage
    Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 8:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ I do not think so, as daggers are not ammuntion. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 8:28
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I am not sure if in this case "ammunition" stands for the property, or if you must have enough weapons for all the attacks \$\endgroup\$
    – Eddymage
    Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 8:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ Related: Can thrown weapons be used for the Hunter ranger's Volley feature? \$\endgroup\$
    – Eddymage
    Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 8:30
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I think ammunition generally refers to something that is used with a weapon, not the weapon itself, for examplel the dictionary defines it (more modernly) as "a supply or quantity of bullets and shells". The linked answer also supports that technical reading, RAW. Of course the DM may rule otherwise; I'll add that to the answer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 31, 2022 at 8:33

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .