15
\$\begingroup\$

The third benefit of the Sentinel feat is described as follows (PHB, p. 169):

  • When a creature within 5 feet of you makes an attack against a target other than you (and that target doesn’t have this feat), you can use your reaction to make a melee weapon attack against the attacking creature.

Does the third benefit of Sentinel count as an opportunity attack for the purpose of reducing their speed to 0 (per the first benefit of the feat)?

For reference, the description of the first benefit of Sentinel says:

  • When you hit a creature with an opportunity attack, the creature's speed becomes 0 for the rest of the turn.
\$\endgroup\$
1

1 Answer 1

31
\$\begingroup\$

No, it's not an opportunity attack.

An opportunity attack is a specifically named game mechanic with specific rules set out for it (as found on page 195 of the PHB).

If the third benefit of the Sentinel feat was meant to be an opportunity attack, it would say something like:

[...] you can make an opportunity attack against the attacking creature.

As it's written, it's not counted as an opportunity attack because it doesn't say it is. What the third benefit of the Sentinel feat (PHB, p. 169) does say is that:

[...] you can use your reaction to make a melee weapon attack against the attacking creature.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 10
    \$\begingroup\$ If you look at examples of things that do grant opportunity attacks, like Polearm Master ("...other creatures provoke an opportunity attack from you when they enter your reach") and Cavalier's Hold the Line ability ("Creatures provoke an opportunity attack from you when they move 5 feet or more while within your reach"), the contrast in wording is especially clear. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dacromir
    Commented Feb 22, 2018 at 11:12
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ You may wish to point out that since it uses the player's reaction, it precludes using an opportunity attack since the reaction was already used ... or, if an opportunity attack was already taken, this reaction would not be available. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 22, 2018 at 20:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .