5
\$\begingroup\$

Compared with, say, oh, I don't know... Toughness... this feat seems to cover the same territory (assuming a feat every two levels) pretty exactly, but you absolutely have to take psionic feats to keep up. Now, you can, of course, take both (although Toughness isn't a psionic feat, of course), but what about for the psion who doesn't (flavourfully) want to take Toughness? Seems to me like the rules would be improved if you could only take one or the other, but Psionic Body gave, say, three hit points per psionic feat.

Thoughts?

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

7
\$\begingroup\$

Yes, Psionic Body is underpowered – and so is Toughness

Both Toughness and Psionic Body are absolutely awful feats that should just about never be taken for their own sake. They do get a kinda-sorta exception though:

  • The game will never get past level 1, maybe 2
  • You’re playing a low-HD class
  • You have really bad ability scores so your Constitution is low
  • You have plenty of abilities already (i.e. spells or something similar)

Then it might be a ... not-entirely-awful choice. And Psionic Body can be considerably better in this case: if you are a psion, you start with a bonus psionic feat; that’s 4 HP. If you’re a human, you could take a third, for 6, twice what Toughness gets you.

But even in this circumstance, these feats are painfully weak. It is not a large amount of HP that you’re gaining in any of these scenarios. A feat for 6 HP is sort of substantial at 1st level but it won’t be at 2nd, and definitely not at 3rd. And the scaling on Toughness is just too slow; 1 HP/level is equivalent to a +2 bonus to Constitution, but only for HP. You can buy that.

However, all that said, don’t get the idea that HP isn’t important. It is. It’s just that these feats simply don’t improve your HP enough for their cost. Feats are extraordinarily valuable; you get very few, and some of them can do incredible things. You can, and should, get magic items to improve your Constitution. Spending feats to do poorly what magic items can do well is a bad choice every time.

\$\endgroup\$
0
-2
\$\begingroup\$

Psionic Body is definitely balanced with Toughness. Since you get a feat every other level, a character that takes only psionic feats gets the same number of hit points from either feat. However, a character that gets bonus psionic feats is able to eke out a few extra hit points that way.

Basically, you lose the ability to take non-psionic feats and gain a few extra hit points over what Toughness would give you. For example, a Psion gets 5 bonus psionic feats. If they only take psionic feats for their normal feat choices, then Psionic Body gives them 10 more hit points than toughness would.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ -1: While you're not wrong, from a technical standpoint (the feats are around the same power level), I feel like this answer is a bit irrelevant, because both feats are incredibly underpowered. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 21:21
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Well, yeah, neither is a particularly good feat, but the querent asked "Compared to Toughness, is Psionic Body underpowered?", which is what this answer addresses. \$\endgroup\$
    – DuckTapeAl
    Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 21:24
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ The big, bold title question is whether or not the feat is underpowered; ultimately, that question needs to be answered. This answer doesn’t, and by failing to answer it explicitly but comparing it positively to another (underpowered) feat, implies the wrong answer. Just because the querent thought it was underpowered for the wrong reason, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t answer the entire question. \$\endgroup\$
    – KRyan
    Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 21:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .