9
\$\begingroup\$

DnD 5e has a fairly clear set of rules governing a player's possible Actions in Combat, and in other fast-paced situations a GM may break time into rounds. Among the listed actions, some would seem to initiate combat (e.g., Attack) but others are routinely performed out of combat (e.g., casting a ritual spell).

Certain rules make the combat actions sound like they are only for the purpose of managing fast-paced events. On the other hand, there are inconsistenties with this view. For example, spells cast as bonus actions are especially fast spells (citation needed), but cannot be cast as an action (citation needed), so length of time cannot be the only distinguishing characteristic between spells which can be cast as an action or bonus action.

So ... what can a player do in combat that they cannot do while adventuring?

Here's the start of an answer (to which I'll add as answers come in):

  1. Behaviors that trigger combat. (Debatable, since the behavior may have actually occurred out of combat.)
  2. Certain reactions whose triggers cannot occur out of combat.

Please clearly specify your reasons for your answer (e.g., RAW, RAI, logical deduction, common practice for groups you've been part of, etc). Citation of rules or expert opinion adds value to your answers.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Related, but more specific: Can a Bonus Action be used outside of a combat encounter? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 21, 2016 at 19:53
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ This article by the Angry GM could be relevant: theangrygm.com/… It argues that there is no such thing as a combat encounter, and that combat rules are unnecessary. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ladifas
    Commented Apr 21, 2016 at 20:25
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @Ladifas That sounds like the start to a great answer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 21, 2016 at 21:02

2 Answers 2

17
\$\begingroup\$

Similar to how you can take an action outside of combat, you can also take bonus actions (assuming of course, they are available).

There are some noteworthy exceptions, specifically that if the bonus action has requirements they must be met. For instance, you could only parry if someone was attacking you. If you were casting a spell as a bonus action you would need the spell components, etc.

A good way to think about it - combat is just a special set of rules to help govern how combat takes place, and makes it easier for the DM to track everything happening in such a short period of time. Outside of needing to track time sensitive events there is no restrictions other then the ones mentioned above. I believe the related question & answer summarize this already.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Please edit as to your source, whether RAW, RAI, practice you've observed, etc. Citations welcome. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 21, 2016 at 21:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ Note that it's usually trivial for players to start a combat amongst themselves, and there's no rules saying you actually have to attempt harm to your opponents in combat; Even if a GM were to rule that some spells & etc. can only be performed in combat, that's not really a meaningful limitation. \$\endgroup\$
    – GMJoe
    Commented Apr 22, 2016 at 0:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ @GMJoe I didn't understand the motivation for your comment the first day I read it. On second read, is your implication, "Even if combat was necessary for an action or bonus action to be performed, players could do so at will" ? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 19:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ @SorcererQzot Pretty much, yeah. Almost any action players can take in combat with monsters they can also take when not in combat with monsters; I figured an extra argument might strengthen this answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – GMJoe
    Commented Apr 27, 2016 at 0:03
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This is right. It's like the zoom mentioned in this answer. Initiative order happens because so many things are happening at once. Outside of combat, it's easier: "Ok, it's pretty peaceful here in the castle bedroom. The wind is blowing gently from the open window and the moon is up. You wanted to cast Identify on that amulet you found, right Bill? And I think Mary wanted to search the chest in the corner? Is there anything else anyone wants to do before leaving this room?" \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 29, 2020 at 15:07
2
\$\begingroup\$

You can take all actions that do not involve fighting outside of combat

The answer is essentially the same in all of these cases: combat is just a construct to help gameplay zoom in when a lot of things are happening at the same time. The PHB expains this on page 189:

Combat in D&D can be chaotic, deadly, and thrilling. This chapter provides the rules you need for your characters and monsters to engage in combat. (...) The game organizes the chaos of combat into a cycle of rounds and turns.

There is the proof by reductio ad absurdum: if you could not take actions outside of combat, outside combat you could not cast cure wounds or any other spell. Or drink a potion. Or remove something from your backpack. Or Run. Or Hide. Or Search for secret doors. Or help someone. And so on.

So in general, you can do anything you can do in combat also out of combat. Except for actual fighting.

Some actions make no sense without being in combat. Sure you can attack an object, e.g. to chop down a door outside combat. But if you want to attack a creature that could hit back, this implies combat. Parry only happens when you are being attacked and implies combat. Disengage only makes sense in combat. And there is a whole separate question on when combat actually starts, related to the Ready action.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .